Your message can ask the writers to check a claim.
Separate repair research led people to propose BPC-157 with TB-500. If we've described that work wrongly, you can tell us. Messages can concern a study result or FDA rule. The writers can't assess your injury or provide treatment.
A wrong number or missing study is worth checking
BPC-157 TB-500 grew from separate work on injury repair. You can use the form to question our account of that work. Tell us which study, number, or pharmacy fact seems wrong.
Every message about those matters gets read. Your source helps the writers check the claim.
Questioning a study number is like checking an item on your bill. Name the item and show where the correct number appears.
The writers don't run a clinic or pharmacy, or write prescriptions. They can't assess your health or tell you a personal dose. They can't supply the mixture or advise you on obtaining it.
Your medical or legal questions need an appropriately qualified professional. This form reaches people explaining research, rather than providing care.
Your source helps identify which sentence needs correcting
First, point to the claim or number you think is wrong. Then send the original paper or FDA page if you have it. A claim linked to the wrong study is worth flagging too.
The Wolverine pharmacy explanation may need changes when FDA publishes new facts. We check the original source before changing the account.
Your private medical details aren't needed to check a written claim.
We don't collect personal health information, so keep those details out. You can write about a study, its numbered reference, or pharmacy rules. You can also name a sentence you couldn't follow.
The full paper list and identifying numbers gives study and FDA links. Those sources help show which sentence conflicts with the original. A clear link gives the writers something specific to check.